Skip to content

heu/fasthttp

 
 

Repository files navigation

fasthttp

Fast HTTP implementation for Go.

Currently fasthttp is successfully used in a production serving up to 1M concurrent keep-alive connections doing 100K qps from a single server.

Documentation

Examples

HTTP server performance comparison with net/http

In short, fasthttp is up to 10 times faster than net/http. Below are benchmark results.

GOMAXPROCS=1

net/http:

$ GOMAXPROCS=1 go test -bench=NetHTTPServerGet -benchmem
PASS
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet1ReqPerConn           	   50000	     21057 ns/op	    2409 B/op	      30 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet2ReqPerConn           	  100000	     13772 ns/op	    2373 B/op	      24 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10ReqPerConn          	  200000	      8511 ns/op	    2102 B/op	      19 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10KReqPerConn         	  200000	      7501 ns/op	    2034 B/op	      18 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet1ReqPerConn1KClients  	  100000	     22480 ns/op	    2734 B/op	      30 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet2ReqPerConn1KClients  	  100000	     15380 ns/op	    2555 B/op	      24 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10ReqPerConn1KClients 	  100000	     11185 ns/op	    2759 B/op	      19 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10KReqPerConn1KClients	  200000	      7989 ns/op	    2034 B/op	      18 allocs/op

fasthttp:

$ GOMAXPROCS=1 go test -bench=kServerGet -benchmem
PASS
BenchmarkServerGet1ReqPerConn           	 1000000	      2395 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet2ReqPerConn           	 1000000	      1897 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10ReqPerConn          	 1000000	      1285 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10KReqPerConn         	 1000000	      1110 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet1ReqPerConn1KClients  	 1000000	      2186 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet2ReqPerConn1KClients  	 1000000	      1902 ns/op	       1 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10ReqPerConn1KClients 	 1000000	      1343 ns/op	       1 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10KReqPerConn1KClients	 1000000	      1124 ns/op	       1 B/op	       0 allocs/op

GOMAXPROCS=4

net/http:

$ GOMAXPROCS=4 go test -bench=NetHTTPServerGet -benchmem
PASS
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet1ReqPerConn-4           	  200000	      6207 ns/op	    2434 B/op	      30 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet2ReqPerConn-4           	  300000	      4158 ns/op	    2398 B/op	      24 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10ReqPerConn-4          	  500000	      2603 ns/op	    2119 B/op	      19 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10KReqPerConn-4         	 1000000	      2225 ns/op	    2037 B/op	      18 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet1ReqPerConn1KClients-4  	  200000	      5972 ns/op	    2496 B/op	      30 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet2ReqPerConn1KClients-4  	  300000	      4309 ns/op	    2461 B/op	      24 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10ReqPerConn1KClients-4 	  500000	      3787 ns/op	    2533 B/op	      19 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10KReqPerConn1KClients-4	  500000	      2350 ns/op	    2037 B/op	      18 allocs/op

fasthttp:

$ GOMAXPROCS=4 go test -bench=kServerGet -benchmem
PASS
BenchmarkServerGet1ReqPerConn-4           	 1000000	      1038 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet2ReqPerConn-4           	 2000000	       764 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10ReqPerConn-4          	 3000000	       388 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10KReqPerConn-4         	 5000000	       334 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet1ReqPerConn1KClients-4  	 1000000	      1123 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet2ReqPerConn1KClients-4  	 2000000	       759 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10ReqPerConn1KClients-4 	 3000000	       440 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10KReqPerConn1KClients-4	 5000000	       342 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op

Switching from net/http to fasthttp

Unfortunately, fasthttp doesn't provide API identical to net/http. See the FAQ for details.

Important points:

type MyHandler struct {
	foobar string
}

// request handler in net/http style, i.e. method bound to MyHandler struct.
func (h *MyHandler) HandleFastHTTP(ctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx) {
	// notice that we may access MyHandler properties here - see h.foobar.
	fmt.Fprintf(ctx, "Hello, world! Requested path is %q. Foobar is %q",
		ctx.Path(), h.foobar)
}

// request handler in fasthttp style, i.e. just plain function.
func fastHTTPHandler(ctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx) {
	fmt.Fprintf(ctx, "Hi there! RequestURI is %q", ctx.RequestURI())
}

// pass bound struct method to fasthttp
myHandler := &MyHandler{
	foobar: "foobar",
}
fasthttp.ListenAndServe(":8080", myHandler.HandleFastHTTP)

// pass plain function to fasthttp
fasthttp.ListenAndServe(":8081", fastHTTPHandler)
  • The RequestHandler accepts only one argument - RequestCtx. It contains all the functionality required for http request processing and response writing. Below is an example of a simple request handler conversion from net/http to fasthttp.
// net/http request handler
requestHandler := func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
	switch r.URL.Path {
	case "/foo":
		fooHandler(w, r)
	case "/bar":
		barHandler(w, r)
	default:
		http.Error(w, "Unsupported path", http.StatusNotFound)
	}
}
// the corresponding fasthttp request handler
requestHandler := func(ctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx) {
	path := ctx.Path()
	switch {
	case string(path) == "/foo":
		fooHandler(ctx)
	case string(path) == "/bar":
		barHandler(ctx)
	default:
		ctx.Error("Unsupported path", fasthttp.StatusNotFound)
	}
}

Use brilliant tool - race detector - for detecting and eliminating data races in your program.

Performance optimization tips for multi-core systems

  • Use reuseport listener.
  • Run a separate server instance per CPU core with GOMAXPROCS=1.
  • Pin each server instance to a separate CPU core using taskset.
  • Ensure the interrupts of multiqueue network card are evenly distributed between CPU cores. See this article for details.

Fasthttp best practicies

  • Do not allocate objects and []byte buffers - just reuse them as much as possible. Fasthttp API design encourages this.
  • sync.Pool is your best friend.
  • Profile your program in production. go tool pprof --alloc_objects your-program mem.pprof usually gives better insights for optimization opportunities than go tool pprof your-program cpu.pprof.
  • Write tests and benchmarks for hot paths.
  • Avoid conversion between []byte and string, since this may result in memory allocation+copy. Fasthttp API provides functions for both []byte and string - use these functions instead of converting manually between []byte and string.
  • Verify your tests and production code under race detector on a regular basis.

FAQ

  • Why creating yet another http package instead of optimizing net/http?

    Because net/http API limits many optimization opportunities. For example:

    • net/http Request object lifetime isn't limited by request handler execution time. So the server must create new request object per each request instead of reusing existing objects like fasthttp do.
    • net/http headers are stored in a map[string][]string. So the server must parse all the headers, convert them from []byte to string and put them into the map before calling user-provided request handler. This all requires unnesessary memory allocations avoided by fasthttp.
    • net/http client API requires creating new response object per each request.
  • Why fasthttp API is incompatible with net/http?

    Because net/http API limits many optimization opportunities. See the answer above for more details. Also certain net/http API parts are suboptimal for use:

  • Why fasthttp doesn't support HTTP/2.0 and WebSockets?

    There are plans for adding HTTP/2.0 and WebSockets support in the future. In the mean time, third parties may use RequestCtx.Hijack for implementing these goodies.

  • Are there known net/http advantages comparing to fasthttp?

    Yes:

    • net/http supports HTTP/2.0 starting from go1.6.
    • net/http API is stable, while fasthttp API may change at any time.
    • net/http handles more HTTP corner cases.
    • net/http should contain less bugs, since it is used and tested by much wider user base.
    • Many existing web frameworks and request routers are built on top of net/http.
    • net/http works on go older than 1.5.
  • Which GO versions are supported by fasthttp?

    Go1.5+. Older versions won't be supported, since their standard package miss useful functions.

  • Please provide real benchmark data and sever information

    See this issue.

  • Are there plans to add request routing to fasthttp?

    There are no plans to add request routing into fasthttp. I believe request routing must be implemented in a separate package(s) like httprouter. See this issue for more info.

About

Fast HTTP package for Go

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Go 100.0%