func (m *AndMatcher) MatchMayChangeInTheFuture(actual interface{}) bool {
/*
Example with 3 matchers: A, B, C
Match evaluates them: T, F, <?> => F
So match is currently F, what should MatchMayChangeInTheFuture() return?
Seems like it only depends on B, since currently B MUST change to allow the result to become T
Match eval: T, T, T => T
So match is currently T, what should MatchMayChangeInTheFuture() return?
Seems to depend on ANY of them being able to change to F.
*/
if m.firstFailedMatcher == nil {
// so all matchers succeeded.. Any one of them changing would change the result.
for _, matcher := range m.Matchers {
if oraclematcher.MatchMayChangeInTheFuture(matcher, actual) {
return true
}
}
return false // none of were going to change
} else {
// one of the matchers failed.. it must be able to change in order to affect the result
return oraclematcher.MatchMayChangeInTheFuture(m.firstFailedMatcher, actual)
}
}
func (assertion *AsyncAssertion) matcherMayChange(matcher types.GomegaMatcher, value interface{}) bool {
if assertion.actualInputIsAFunction() {
return true
}
return oraclematcher.MatchMayChangeInTheFuture(matcher, value)
}
func (m *WithTransformMatcher) MatchMayChangeInTheFuture(_ interface{}) bool {
// TODO: Maybe this should always just return true? (Only an issue for non-deterministic transformers.)
//
// Querying the next matcher is fine if the transformer always will return the same value.
// But if the transformer is non-deterministic and returns a different value each time, then there
// is no point in querying the next matcher, since it can only comment on the last transformed value.
return oraclematcher.MatchMayChangeInTheFuture(m.Matcher, m.transformedValue)
}
func (m *NotMatcher) MatchMayChangeInTheFuture(actual interface{}) bool {
return oraclematcher.MatchMayChangeInTheFuture(m.Matcher, actual) // just return m.Matcher's value
}