func (s *EntrySuite) TestEntries(c *gc.C) {
initial := ft.Entries{
ft.File{"some-file", "content", 0600},
ft.Dir{"some-dir", 0750},
ft.Symlink{"some-link", "target"},
ft.Removed{"missing"},
}
expectRemoveds := ft.Entries{
ft.Removed{"some-file"},
ft.Removed{"some-dir"},
ft.Removed{"some-link"},
ft.Removed{"missing"},
}
removeds := initial.AsRemoveds()
c.Assert(removeds, jc.DeepEquals, expectRemoveds)
expectPaths := []string{"some-file", "some-dir", "some-link", "missing"}
c.Assert(initial.Paths(), jc.DeepEquals, expectPaths)
c.Assert(removeds.Paths(), jc.DeepEquals, expectPaths)
chainRemoveds := initial.Create(c, s.basePath).Check(c, s.basePath).AsRemoveds()
c.Assert(chainRemoveds, jc.DeepEquals, expectRemoveds)
chainRemoveds = chainRemoveds.Create(c, s.basePath).Check(c, s.basePath)
c.Assert(chainRemoveds, jc.DeepEquals, expectRemoveds)
}
func (s *ManifestDeployerSuite) TestUpgradeConflictResolveRetrySameCharm(c *gc.C) {
// Create base install.
s.deployCharm(c, 1,
ft.File{"shared-file", "old", 0755},
ft.File{"old-file", "old", 0644},
)
// Create mock upgrade charm that can (claim to) fail to expand...
failDeploy := true
upgradeContent := ft.Entries{
ft.File{"shared-file", "new", 0755},
ft.File{"new-file", "new", 0644},
}
mockCharm := mockBundle{
paths: set.NewStrings(upgradeContent.Paths()...),
expand: func(targetPath string) error {
upgradeContent.Create(c, targetPath)
if failDeploy {
return fmt.Errorf("oh noes")
}
return nil
},
}
info := s.addMockCharm(c, 2, mockCharm)
err := s.deployer.Stage(info, nil)
c.Assert(err, gc.IsNil)
// ...and see it fail to expand. We're not too bothered about the actual
// content of the target dir at this stage, but we do want to check it's
// still marked as based on the original charm...
err = s.deployer.Deploy()
c.Assert(err, gc.Equals, charm.ErrConflict)
s.assertCharm(c, 1)
// ...and we want to verify that if we "fix the errors" and redeploy the
// same charm...
failDeploy = false
err = s.deployer.NotifyResolved()
c.Assert(err, gc.IsNil)
err = s.deployer.Deploy()
c.Assert(err, gc.IsNil)
// ...we end up with the right stuff in play.
s.assertCharm(c, 2, upgradeContent...)
ft.Removed{"old-file"}.Check(c, s.targetPath)
}
func (s *ManifestDeployerSuite) TestUpgradeConflictRevertRetryDifferentCharm(c *gc.C) {
// Create base install and add a user file.
s.deployCharm(c, 1,
ft.File{"shared-file", "old", 0755},
ft.File{"old-file", "old", 0644},
)
userFile := ft.File{"user-file", "user", 0644}.Create(c, s.targetPath)
// Create a charm upgrade that never works (but still writes a bunch of files),
// and deploy it.
badUpgradeContent := ft.Entries{
ft.File{"shared-file", "bad", 0644},
ft.File{"bad-file", "bad", 0644},
}
badCharm := mockBundle{
paths: set.NewStrings(badUpgradeContent.Paths()...),
expand: func(targetPath string) error {
badUpgradeContent.Create(c, targetPath)
return fmt.Errorf("oh noes")
},
}
badInfo := s.addMockCharm(c, 2, badCharm)
err := s.deployer.Stage(badInfo, nil)
c.Assert(err, gc.IsNil)
err = s.deployer.Deploy()
c.Assert(err, gc.Equals, charm.ErrConflict)
// Notify the Deployer that it'll be expected to revert the changes from
// the last attempt.
err = s.deployer.NotifyRevert()
c.Assert(err, gc.IsNil)
// Create a charm upgrade that creates a bunch of different files, without
// error, and deploy it; check user files are preserved, and nothing from
// charm 1 or 2 is.
s.deployCharm(c, 3,
ft.File{"shared-file", "new", 0755},
ft.File{"new-file", "new", 0644},
)
userFile.Check(c, s.targetPath)
ft.Removed{"old-file"}.Check(c, s.targetPath)
ft.Removed{"bad-file"}.Check(c, s.targetPath)
}