// assumes that: caller has acquired scheduler lock and that the task is still pending
func (b *binder) bind(ctx api.Context, binding *api.Binding, task *podtask.T) (err error) {
// sanity check: ensure that the task hasAcceptedOffer(), it's possible that between
// Schedule() and now that the offer for this task was rescinded or invalidated.
// ((we should never see this here))
if !task.HasAcceptedOffer() {
return fmt.Errorf("task has not accepted a valid offer %v", task.ID)
}
// By this time, there is a chance that the slave is disconnected.
offerId := task.GetOfferId()
if offer, ok := b.api.offers().Get(offerId); !ok || offer.HasExpired() {
// already rescinded or timed out or otherwise invalidated
return b.rollback(task, fmt.Errorf("failed prior to launchTask due to expired offer for task %v", task.ID))
}
if err = b.prepareTaskForLaunch(ctx, binding.Target.Name, task, offerId); err == nil {
log.V(2).Infof("launching task: %q on target %q slave %q for pod \"%v/%v\"",
task.ID, binding.Target.Name, task.Spec.SlaveID, task.Pod.Namespace, task.Pod.Name)
if err = b.api.launchTask(task); err == nil {
b.api.offers().Invalidate(offerId)
task.Set(podtask.Launched)
if err = b.api.tasks().Update(task); err != nil {
// this should only happen if the task has been removed or has changed status,
// which SHOULD NOT HAPPEN as long as we're synchronizing correctly
log.Errorf("failed to update task w/ Launched status: %v", err)
}
return
}
}
return b.rollback(task, fmt.Errorf("Failed to launch task %v: %v", task.ID, err))
}
// Call ScheduleFunc and subtract some resources, returning the name of the machine the task is scheduled on
func (k *qingScheduler) doSchedule(task *podtask.T, err error) (string, error) {
var offer offers.Perishable
if task.HasAcceptedOffer() {
// verify that the offer is still on the table
offerId := task.GetOfferId()
if offer, ok := k.api.offers().Get(offerId); ok && !offer.HasExpired() {
// skip tasks that have already have assigned offers
offer = task.Offer
} else {
task.Offer.Release()
task.Reset()
if err = k.api.tasks().Update(task); err != nil {
return "", err
}
}
}
if err == nil && offer == nil {
offer, err = k.api.algorithm()(k.api.offers(), k.api, task)
}
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
details := offer.Details()
if details == nil {
return "", fmt.Errorf("offer already invalid/expired for task %v", task.ID)
}
slaveId := details.GetSlaveId().GetValue()
if slave, ok := k.api.slaveFor(slaveId); !ok {
// not much sense in Release()ing the offer here since its owner died
offer.Release()
k.api.offers().Invalidate(details.Id.GetValue())
return "", fmt.Errorf("Slave disappeared (%v) while scheduling task %v", slaveId, task.ID)
} else {
if task.Offer != nil && task.Offer != offer {
return "", fmt.Errorf("task.offer assignment must be idempotent, task %+v: offer %+v", task, offer)
}
task.Offer = offer
//TODO(jdef) FillFromDetails currently allocates fixed (hardwired) cpu and memory resources for all
//tasks. This will be fixed once we properly integrate parent-cgroup support into the kublet-executor.
//For now we are completely ignoring the resources specified in the pod.
//see: https://github.com/mesosphere/qingyuan-mesos/issues/68
task.FillFromDetails(details)
if err := k.api.tasks().Update(task); err != nil {
offer.Release()
return "", err
}
return slave.HostName, nil
}
}